By Mark Williams, The Sunday Times (UK), 6 November 2018 at 18:10:52From the outset, it’s clear that “cultural Marxism” is the name of a new ideology that has come to dominate the modern world.
Its an ideology that claims to explain and explain why the world is, in the words of its founder, Jean-François Lyotard, “cultural in its character and its destiny”.
The term itself is a combination of “Marxism” and “socialism”.
In essence, it describes the ideology of a society based on an economic, political and cultural system that seeks to create an entirely new, and superior, world for itself.
The aim is to create a system that is, by definition, not based on the existing world.
What the new ideology of cultural Marxism claims to demonstrate is that all that has gone wrong with the world since the Industrial Revolution has not been caused by the actions of those with a “superior” knowledge of the “world of today” but by those with the “lesser” knowledge.
What we see is that “culture” has become the new “superpower” and that all the problems that plague humanity, both economic and social, are to be blamed on the cultural element that has been transformed into an absolute force in the world.
The history of the modern period, however, reveals that the ideology’s very existence, the fact that it was even invented in the first place, proves the very opposite of its claims.
It was the rise of the Third Reich, and its embrace by the “communist” regimes of Eastern Europe, which led to the “socialist” system of communist regimes in Eastern Europe that has resulted in the modern day world, in which the communist system, with its emphasis on the “superman”, has succeeded in transforming the world into an entirely different place.
That this was done by a system of totalitarianism based on “anti-Semitism” and the ideology that the “greatest threat to the existence of the human race” is not Marxism but Nazism, is evident in the fact it has taken over Europe from the Nazis and has made it the “capital of the world”.
This is why the new world order is dominated by the Communist system and it is why “cultural” Marxism has taken the place of “social” Marxism.
The Communist system was based on a system where the Communist Party and the Communist party were the primary social units.
The Communist Party was a political organisation, while the party was the dominant social unit.
The ideology of the new communist regime was a “totalitarian” one, one that had nothing to do with the ideas of the Marxists or the “anti”-Semitic ideology.
Instead, it was based upon a political ideology that sought to control the world through a totalitarian state.
This meant that the Communist ideology was a tool to control and control the masses.
The ideology of this regime was based, for example, on the slogan “The Communist Party will rule the world”, and in the name, of the party it proclaimed the right to rule the entire world.
As the communist regime became established, however.
the idea of “totalitarism” was discredited and its proponents were condemned for having “betrayed” the “struggle for human freedom”.
This means that the new regime has not only failed to rule, but it has also failed to represent the human rights of the masses in a way that they could be supported by the new government.
This is why we see that in the face of such failure, the Communist regimes, including in Eastern European countries, have turned to the ideology “cultural communism”.
In this new system, the “cultural revolution” has taken on a completely different character.
In its new form, the ideology has been replaced by an ideology of “national liberation”.
The new ideology has become, to use the words, a “new form of fascism”.
This new form of fascist regime, in turn, has come about because of the decline of the Communist regime, and because of a series of developments in the last century that have radically changed the world order.
The First World WarThe First world war, which began in 1914, changed the course of history in many ways.
It saw the rise and spread of Nazism and the Nazi regime, which, in addition to the destruction of the socialist state, was a driving force behind the rise to power of the fascists.
It also saw the first significant changes in the political structure of the Western world.
For example, the First World war saw the beginning of the rise in economic power of large industrial nations.
This power led to a period of economic growth that was, in many respects, unprecedented in human history.
It was also a period in which industrial nations were given the freedom to exploit and exploit.
In many ways, the economic growth of the Great Depression was, to put it mildly, a terrible